Homelessness, politics, and what would Jesus do?

Today's Vancouver Sun has an item that would be of great concern to the people who have been working so hard to end homelessness in the city -- and who have made a political stake in that effort. The annual homeless count is expected to show a sharp increase, despite the efforts of the past few years and Mayor Gregor Robertson's campaign promise of 2008 to end homelessness by 2015.

I've pointed out in the past that there is a subtle difference between that campaign promise and the stated goal today; the Mayor talks of street homelessness, but his promise in 2008 was to eliminate homelessness, which I contend is decidedly different. But today's item points out what a complex task this is, relying as it does on different levels of government, each with its own agenda, and ultimately on the good will of the people who actually have the money to build housing. It's easy to make a campaign commitment; it's even easier to point and sneer when that commitment isn't met (behold the turtle, who only makes progress when he sticks his neck out); there's no shortage of reasons why things haven't gone as planned.

But what about the people who are really affected by this -- and I don't mean Gregor Robertson's campaign workers or Penny Ballem's staff? We're talking about people who need a place to live -- the homeless, drug-addicted, mentally ill -- who have become, once again, socio-political footballs. Once again, The Man has let them down, as he always does. The inconvenient truth is that we need to wean people off the idea that their problems are going to be solved by any kind of worldly means.

What would Jesus do about the homelessness situation? Would He blockade construction sites or picket incoming businesses? Would He demand politicians do something? Did He make claims about "rights" or condone law-breaking?

Throughout the Gospel, Jesus reminds us about our responsibility to the poor. But at the end of the day, people who are convicted and motivated to live up to that responsibility are not moved by shame or guilt, bullying or threats, but do so out of love -- because Jesus is God and God is Love. Love -- not money, jobs, cheap housing, addiction programs -- is THE MOST IMPORTANT THING (what could be more important than God?): love your enemies; pray for those who use you spitefully.

So when you see and hear about demonstrations and protests and activists vowing to block development until they get what they want and saying things like, "we don't want those kind of people here" (referring to developers and higher-income folks moving into new projects in the Central Hastings area), we need to ask where the love is. If the love isn't there, then neither is Jesus ... and neither is God ... and neither is any blessing.

Trust me: developers and politicians -- like any human being -- respond really well to love.

Some might compare activism like protesting and blockading to Jesus' clearing out the Temple, but His actions in kicking over the tables and driving out the merchants were only half of what He did that day. He then "taught them ... 'Is it not written, "My house shall be called of all nations the house of prayer, but ye have made it a den of thieves"?'" (Mark 11:17 KJV). Matthew records that He then healed people.

Do we have something to teach those we disagree with? Are we able to heal?

Do we know better than God, what the solution to a problem should be?

If we approach the situation in love, with forgiveness and meekness of heart, we allow God in. Situations that don't look right to us start to gain meaning and we start to see what God is up to by putting us and others into those situations. Sure, they don't look right, but remember that, when Jesus was crucified, that didn't look terribly "right" to a lot of people -- but look what happened next.